June 9, 2010 .NET, C#, Concurrency, Performance
June 9, 2010 .NET, C#, Concurrency, Performance
I agree that title doesn’t promise a lot of interesting stuff at first glance especially for experienced .net developers. But unless you encounter some issue due to incorrect usage of timers you will never think that root is in timers.
System.Threading.Timer vs. System.Windows.Forms.Timer
In few words what are differences between Threading and Forms timers just to start with something.
System.Threading.Timer executes some method on periodic bases. But what is interesting is that execution of method is performed in separate thread taken from ThreadPool. In other words it calls QueueUserWorkItem somewhere internally for your method at specified intervals.
System.Windows.Forms.Timer ensure as that execution of our method will be in the same thread where we’ve created timer.
What if operation takes longer than period?
Let’s now think what will happen if the operation we set for execution takes longer than interval.
When I have following code:
my application behaves well – prints “a” twice a second. I took a look for number of threads in Task Manager and it stays constantly (7 threads).
Let now change following line: Thread.Sleep(500) to Thread.Sleep(8000). What will happen now? Just think before continue to read.
I’m almost completely sure that you predicted printing “a” every second after 8 seconds have passed. As you already guessed each of the “a” printings are scheduled in separate threads allocated from ThreadPool. So… amount of threads is constantly increasing… (Every 1.125 seconds :) )
Issue I’ve been investigating
Some mister X also figured out that Console.WriteLine(“a”) is critical and should run in one thread, at least because he is not sure how much does it take to execute Thread.Sleep(500). To ensure it will run in one thread he decided to have lock, like in code below:
Yes, this code ensures that section under lock is executed in one thread. And you know this code works well unless your execution takes few hours and you will be out of threads and out of memory. :) So that is an issue I’ve been investigating.
My first idea was System.Windows.Forms.Timer
My first idea was to change this timer to the System.Windows.Forms.Timer, and it worked well in application, but that application is able to run in GUI and WinService modes. But there are so many complains over interned to do not use Forms.Timer for non UI stuff. Also if you put Forms.Timer into your console application it will simply not work.
Why System.Timers.Timer is good toy?
System.Timers.Timer is just wrapper over System.Threading.Timer, but what is very interesting is that it provides us with more developer-friendly abilities like enabling and disabling it.
My final decision which fixes issue is to disable timer when we are diving into our operation and enable on exit. In my app timer executes every 30 seconds so this could not be a problem. Fix looks like:
And it looks that we don’t need lock there, but I left it there just to be sure is case if SomeOperation will be called from dozen of other threads.
MAKE DECISION ON TIMER BASING ON THIS TABLE (from msdn article)
System.Windows.Forms | System.Timers | System.Threading | |
---|---|---|---|
Timer event runs on what thread? | UI thread | UI or worker thread | Worker thread |
Instances are thread safe? | No | Yes | No |
Familiar/intuitive object model? | Yes | Yes | No |
Requires Windows Forms? | Yes | No | No |
Metronome-quality beat? | No | Yes* | Yes* |
Timer event supports state object? | No | No | Yes |
Initial timer event can be scheduled? | No | No | Yes |
Class supports inheritance? | Yes | Yes | No |
* Depending on the availability of system resources (for example, worker threads |
I hope my story is useful and when you will be searching like “C# Timer Threads issues” or “Allocation of threads when using timer” you will find my article and it will help you.
Markdown | Result |
---|---|
*text* | text |
**text** | text |
***text*** | text |
`code` | code |
~~~ more code ~~~~ |
more code |
[Link](https://www.example.com) | Link |
* Listitem |
|
> Quote | Quote |
he-hem when I first read this I never thought it will be of any use for me so soon :)
Thanks for explanation!
You see :)
I'm glad that my blog helps people and me as well… It indeed pays off.
The way disabling and enabling the timer was eye-opening to me as I'm a newcomer to Threading. Your solutions and explanation really taught me good points. Thanks for your posting.
Great explanation!
Did you ever find a problem with System.Threading.Timer ?
I found on my service (using System.Threading.Timer) It is sometimes missing one callback execution.
Also every callback is happened after 32 seconds, even i declared it for 30 sec like this:
timer = new Timer(SomeOperation, null, 0, 30000).
Any Idea why is that happened?
Great post man, thanks